By Giovanni Sartor, Pompeu Casanovas, Mariangela Biasiotti, Meritxell Fernández-Barrera
Legal ontologies have proved an important for representing, processing and retrieving criminal details, and may collect an expanding value within the rising framework of the Semantic internet. regardless of the various learn initiatives within the box, a collective mirrored image at the theoretical foundations of felony ontology engineering was once nonetheless lacking. This e-book bridges the space, by means of exploring present methodologies and theoretical techniques to felony ontologies. It gathers sixteen papers, every one of them offering concerns and recommendations for ontology engineering regarding a selected method of, or element of, the legislation: comparative legislations, case-based reasoning, multilingualism, complicated- structures, sociolegal research, criminal idea, social ontology, ontology studying, computational ontology, provider ontology, cognitive technology, rfile modelling, huge criminal databases, medical, linguistic and legal-technology views. The e-book will hence curiosity researchers in felony informatics, synthetic intelligence and legislations, felony conception, felony philosophy, felony sociology, comparative legislation, in addition to builders of functions in keeping with the clever administration of felony info, in either e-commerce and e-government (e-administration, e-justice, e-democracy).
Read Online or Download Approaches to Legal Ontologies: Theories, Domains, Methodologies PDF
Best law books
@$#*%! Our such a lot taboo notice and the way the legislation retains it forbidden.
This enjoyable learn is set the notice "fuck", the legislations, and the taboo. no matter if you shout it out on the street or whisper it within the bed room, intentionally plan a protest, or spontaneously blurt it out, if you happen to say "fuck," an individual desires to silence you, both with a filthy glance around the room or by way of creating a rule that you simply can't say the note. whilst it's the govt. attempting to cleanse your language, even though, you need to fear. phrases are rules. If the govt controls the phrases we use, it might keep watch over what we predict. to guard this liberty, we needs to first comprehend why the law's remedy of "fuck" places that freedom at risk.
This booklet examines the legislation surrounding the observe and divulges either inconsistencies in its therapy and pressure with different identifiable criminal rights that the legislations easily doesn't resolution. the facility of taboo offers the framework to appreciate those uncertainties. It additionally explains why makes an attempt to curtail using "fuck" via legislations are doomed to fail. essentially, it persists since it is taboo; no longer despite it.
The Federal fresh Air Act of 1970 is greatly noticeable as a progressive criminal reaction to the disasters of the sooner universal legislation regime, which had ruled pollution within the usa for greater than a century. Noga Morag-Levine demanding situations this view, highlighting notable continuities among the assumptions governing present pollution law within the usa and the foundations that had guided the sooner nuisance regime.
This e-book makes a speciality of a selected part of the normative size of legislation, particularly, law’s normative declare. via ’normative claim,’ which means the declare that, inherent within the legislation, is a capability to steer motion by means of producing functional purposes having a unique prestige. The thesis that legislation lays the normative declare has turn into a topic of controversy.
- The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960 (Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures)
- The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review
- Forgiveness, Mercy, and Clemency
- Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code Handbook (Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code Handbook)
- Rollo at Play
Extra info for Approaches to Legal Ontologies: Theories, Domains, Methodologies
Framenet models for the law are thus already under development as a complement to legal ontologies (Venturi et al. 2009, Agnoloni et al. 2009).
22 One of the peculiarities of Holmes classification is the shift of perspective, for he tried to solve the problems in Austin’s taxonomy by suggesting a classification of the law on the basis of duties instead of rights (Kellogg 1984: 6; Kellogg 2007: 67). 40 M. Fernández-Barrera and G. >
The discussion concerning the meaning of a legal concept in a legal system concerns establishing what norms -leading to, or departing from, the term expressing the concept- hold in that system. Since the inferential links holding in a legal system represent, or are derivable from, norms of such a system, this discussion is inseparable from the doctrinal issues concerning what legal norms belong to a legal system (given the available legal material, such as legislation, precedent, custom, and so on) and consequently constitute correct premises of legal reasoning with regard to that system.
Approaches to Legal Ontologies: Theories, Domains, Methodologies by Giovanni Sartor, Pompeu Casanovas, Mariangela Biasiotti, Meritxell Fernández-Barrera