By Joel Andreas
Addicted to conflict takes at the so much energetic, robust, and harmful army on the earth. Hard-hitting, rigorously documented, and seriously illustrated, it finds why the USA has been focused on extra wars lately than the other nation. learn Addicted to battle to discover who advantages from those army adventures, who pays—and who dies.
"Political comics at its best."—Michael Parenti
Joel Andreas wrote and illustrated The impressive Rocky, a satire that brought greater than 100,000 humans to the unsavory actions of the Rockefeller family members. In among drawing illustrated exposes, he investigates the trajectory and destiny of the chinese language Revolution.
Read Online or Download Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism PDF
Similar war & peace books
A tremendous new learn of the realities of latest struggle, which offers a number clean insights and is vital interpreting for all scholars and pros engaged within the box. This ebook sincerely exhibits us that: neither army nor civilian businesses can act successfully by myself in resolving sleek conflicts joint civil-military efforts are wanted, and people efforts needs to be intentionally deliberate from the outset of an operation; they can not be extra on as afterthoughts whilst all else has failed the checklist of our efforts over approximately a decade and a part because the finish of the chilly warfare demonstrates that we're doing badly at growing civil-military partnerships, and that we aren't convalescing.
This compelling e-book tells the inspirational tales of guys and ladies who fought for peace, freedom, equality, and human rights through the 20th century. those brave participants contain best figures comparable to Mahatma Gandhi, Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr. , Nelson Mandela, VOclav Havel, and Mikhail Gorbachev, in addition to Nobel Prize winners Aung San Suu Kyi, Andrei Sakharov, and Muhammad Yunus.
Dennis C. Jett examines why peacekeeping operations fail by way of evaluating the unsuccessful try at peacekeeping in Angola with the winning attempt in Mozambique, along quite a lot of different peacekeeping reports. The publication argues that whereas the reasons of earlier peacekeeping disasters could be pointed out, the probabilities for achievement could be tough to enhance end result of the approach such operations are initiated and carried out, and how the United countries operates as a company.
As soon as embroiled in expensive, protracted struggle, a few political leaders dig of their heels regardless of mounting casualties and growing domestic discontent whereas others end up extra apt to chop the state's losses and produce the warfare to a well timed end. Addressing such edition in behavior, this e-book examines the matter of warfare termination via a civil-military lens.
- Lost in Transformation: Violent Peace and Peaceful Conflict in Northern Ireland
- Developing countries in international trade 2007 : trade and development index
- Enforcing the Peace: Learning from the Imperial Past
- Peacebuilding and Ex-Combatants: Political Reintegration in Liberia
- Der Nahostkonflikt. Geschichte, Positionen, Perspektiven
- Toward a Credible Pacifism: Violence and the Possibilities of Politics
Additional resources for Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism
An effective mobilization strategy is to exaggerate grievances and threats, raise fears, stereotype adversaries, sharpen distinctive and exclusive identities, and promote collective myths and ethnic solidarities. Such a strategy will be met with a matching strategy of propaganda, falsehood, and fear. Polarization in discourse makes the relationship between adversaries more hostile and more violent. Conciliation and peace making will be more difficult with adversaries one has successfully labeled hostile, untrustworthy, amoral, and barbaric.
That we are attacking you because you have wronged us . . the strong do what they can, and the weak submit” (Thucydides 1960: 402). In today’s international relations, writes Roger Fisher: The position which a country takes in a particular controversy is usually not an ad hoc position applicable only to those circumstances; it generally reflects broad political and moral principles of wide applicability. A major difficulty in settling a dispute lies in the fact that it is often seen in terms of principle, and on matters of principle countries are usually unwilling to yield.
Outcomes should be feasible, acceptable, and final Issues differ on obstacles to resolution (Oberschall 1973: 49–64). Issues whose outcomes are divisible and reversible are more easily resolved than indivisible and irreversible issues. Divisibility makes for give-and-take bargaining; reversible outcomes might be renegotiated at a later time. Stateness is recognition of a political entity in the international system of states and control of a legitimate government in a territory, including the protection of sovereignty in the international system and the legitimate exercise of the use of force in the state.
Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism by Joel Andreas